Dogs Of A Good Society

Information Architecture Reconstruction and Redesign

Overview


The Problem

The non-profit, Dogs Of A Good Society or D.O.G.S., has a goal of providing financial support to animal rescues in order to save animals in need. We have observed that the website isn’t meeting the users need to donate, find assistance, or understand what the organization does, which is causing a high bounce rate to the business.

How might we improve the D.O.G.S. website to better facilitate user donations, provide assistance, and effectively communicate the organization's mission to reduce the high bounce rate and increase support for animal rescues?



The Solution

We took a human-centered approach through research and testing and conducted an information architecture (IA) reconstruction to ensure related pages were united under a simple navigation, created an in-house assistance application form, and designed a new call-to-action and hero banner to provide clarity to the nonprofit's mission.


Research


What We Did

In this research project, we planned and conducted 16 interviews with stakeholders and users, and surveyed 10 people.



Stakeholder Interviews





Proto Persona

Our proto persona’s name is Braylee, a 36 year old accountant who volunteers for her local rescue. Her main priority is to find financial support to cover the vet care of a dog that came into their rescue with an emergency medical issue.





Empathy Mapping & Feature Prioritizaton

I created a user interview plan based on the pain points discovered during the stakeholder interviews. Based on the empathy mapping session, we did some feature prioritization work to determine which areas we wanted to tackle based on feasibility, the stakeholder input, and what we learned from the user interviews.





Definition & Ideation


User Persona

Utilizing the information gathered from the user interviews, I transformed the prior proto persona into a user persona. I further defined the user persona to also create user scenarios, goals, and scenario phases.




Heuristic Analysis

I conducted a heuristic analysis on each page of their site and saw a lot of recurring themes in terms of what could be improved:

  • Redundancy throughout all the pages
  • A lot of ‘wordiness’ and too much text
  • Broken links and forms
  • Not mobile friendly; text just gets smaller for mobile
  • Not accessible; color/contrast issues, banners with words not using text and only images


Ideation using I Like, I Wish, What If

I conducted an I Like, I Wish, What If session with the other designers to help generate ideas on what we could do for the non-profit based on the amount of time it would take, feasibility, and tackled the most pressing issues that they were experiencing.

  • Using Miro, conducted a timed ideation session to help hone in on the areas of focus
  • Utilized a voting method to determine which areas to focus on

Design Style Tile & Guide

  • Maintained consistency in color palette and banner font per stakeholder (president) request but changed hues
  • Created mood board for inspiration
  • Inspired by clean and simple fonts for clear and easy to read text
  • Updated logo on white and dark background
  • Created new social media iconography to help with recognition and callouts throughout the page
  • Created new button state versions for a more interactive design and site

Prototyping


Low-Fidelity Prototyping

Pen and paper rough sketches of the desktop site along with brand new designs of a mobile version as the site is not currently responsive.

  • Homepage hero banner to include images of other animals to address users mistaking the group for a dog rescue
  • Designed a new assistance form for rescues and shelters to fill out for financial assistance - Currently being done via outdated Google form
  • Added CTA button within hero banner for users to easily access assistance application



Mid-Fidelity Prototyping





High Fidelity Desktop




High Fidelity Mobile

  • Designed site for responsiveness to ensure site was accessible via mobile
  • New button components with updated states like hover and click
  • Navigation to transform into hamburger menu when in mobile
  • Larger text size throughout to ensure it is legible
  • Updated mission and other text to reduce redundancy and 'wordiness' per heuristic analysis


Testing & Iterating


Sitemap Iterations V1 & V2

Conducted basic card sorting to organize the three sections that did not have any links in version 1 and placed them into related sections as shown in V2.





Mid-Fidelity User Testing

Prior to designing the high fidelity prototypes, I conducted user testing on the mid-fidelity versions. One of the main takeaways from testing was that the banner did not have a clear Call to Action. This feedback was expected as the mid-fidelity was in grayscale and lacked photos. Another piece of feedback was the fact that because the organization is called Dogs Of A Good Society and had a paw print as the logo, users expectedly struggled with knowing that the org helped other types of animals as well.





High Fidelity User Testing

I created two high fidelity versions for AB User Testing. The main difference between the two versions is how we labeled the assistance form and the image we used. We noticed that all of the users preferred the B version, which had the assistance form labeled and an image of a veterinarian. In the carousel hero banner, we put in images of the President's dogs per her request, and also included images of the other types of animals they've helped, like cats, rabbits, and guinea pigs. This was to indicate the organization expanded beyond dogs as users indicated in the mid-fidelity testing that it was unclear.





Themes & Next Steps

Theme: Mission statement is confusing

What we heard from users:

  • “The mission statement feels like it’s a rescue or humane society.”
  • “I would like the have the mission statement go straight to the point.”
  • “Thought this was a non-profit that helped dogs.”
  • “A bit bland and very word heavy. I need shorter chunks of info and less to scroll through so it’s less intimidating to read.”

Future next steps:

  • Create a shorter, easier to digest statement on the homepage of what the organization does

Theme: Users struggled to understand the fields in the assistance form

What we heard from users:

  • “I’m not sure what the date field is for. Today’s date? When we should expect to receive assistance?”
  • “Is the phone and email needed from the requestor or the rescue’s info?”

Future next steps:

  • Ideation session to determine which fields were necessary and how might we label them appropriately for users to understand